ArticleCurrent microbiology2025
Diversity, Composition, and Co-occurrence Network of Rhizosphere and Endophytic Bacterial Communities in Two Growth Stages of Leonurus japonicus.
Article in Current microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Microbial community characterization in semi-hydroponic systems of Starbor kale (Current research in microbial sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leonurus japonicus, a widely distributed plant species, is influenced in its growth by both rhizosphere and root endophytic bacteria; however, the specific interactions between L. japonicus and these two bacterial communities remain poorly understood. To address this, high-throughput Illumina MiSeq sequencing was used to study the dynamics of rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities at two key growth stages: seedling and flowering. The sequencing results showed that the ratio of endophytic bacterial community (ASV: 1432) to rhizosphere bacterial community (ASV: 11,329) was approximately 12.64%. Significant differences were observed in the diversity and evenness of the endophytic bacterial community between the two stages of L. japonicus (P < 0.001). Meanwhile, microbial composition shifted, as shown by differences in some specific genera between stages. Co-occurrence network analysis revealed that interactions between the two bacterial communities and L. japonicus were different at the two growth stages. Specifically, the endophytic bacterial network in the flowering stage was more complex and stable than that in the rhizosphere (avgCC: 0.763 vs 0.633; P/N: 1.451 vs 0.737), while in the seedling stage, the rhizosphere bacterial network exhibited greater complexity and stability (avgCC:0.646 vs 0.615; P/N:0.804 vs 0.633). These studies provide valuable insights into the interaction between L. japonicus and the rhizosphere and endophytic bacterial communities, revealing how it selectively recruits and interacts with microbial partners at two key growth stages. Our findings offer new insights for future studies aimed at elucidating the dynamic mechanisms of plant–microbe interactions and the potential impact of microorganisms on plant growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41461974What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.