Trial reportJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2025
Subgroup analyses of the phase 3 FOCUS study of melphalan/hepatic delivery system in patients with unresectable metastatic uveal melanoma.
Trial report in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Targeting liver metastases in uveal melanoma: ATX-LPA mediated immunosuppression and novel therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess efficacy and safety in subgroups of patients treated with Melphalan/Hepatic Delivery System (melphalan/HDS), a drug/device combination for liver-directed treatment of metastatic UM (mUM) patients. Previously reported FOCUS study results indicated melphalan/HDS treatment provides a clinically meaningful response rate and favorable benefit-risk ratio in patients with unresectable mUM.
methodsPatients with mUM received treatment with melphalan (3.0 mg/kg ideal body weight) every 6-8 weeks for up to 6 cycles. Post hoc analyses of efficacy and safety were conducted for patient subgroups based on demographic and baseline disease characteristics.
results102 patients with mUM were enrolled; treatment was attempted in 95 patients; 91 patients received treatment. Subgroup analyses showed consistent tumor response regardless of age, sex, geographic region, presence/absence of extrahepatic lesions, and prior therapy. Patients with lower tumor burden had better objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) than those with higher tumor burden (ORR: 51.1 vs. 22.2%, p = 0.008; mPFS: 11.3 vs. 5.8 months, p = 0.007; mOS: 26.7 vs. 15.4 months, p = 0.008). Patients with 1-25% liver involvement had higher mOS than those with 26-50% liver involvement (22.4 vs. 16.9 months; p = 0.030); patients with low or normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) had higher mOS than those with elevated LDH (23.5 vs. 15.3 months; p = 0.019). The overall safety profile was similar across subgroups without evidence of cumulative toxicity with successive treatment cycles.
conclusionResults demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile for melphalan/HDS across clinically relevant subgroups. However, early treatment in patients with low tumor burden may offer best results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.