ArticleScientific reports2025
Influence of copy number variation of unknown significance on the pregnancy outcomes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fetal Copy Number Variant Detection in Pregnancies with Ultrasound Soft Markers: A Maternal Age-Stratified Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the influence of VUS on pregnancy outcome and fetuses. 132 VUS CNVs were identified in 3657 fetal amniotic fluid specimens by CNV-Seq. Parent-of-origin testing was subsequently analyzed to determine whether the CNV was inherited or de novo. Pregnancy outcomes of the pregnant women were tracked, and clinical assessments were performed to determine the evidence of any disease in the newborns between 1 and 2 years of age. Pregnant women with VUS in their fetuses were more likely to choose to continue with the pregnancy (105 out of 118, 88.98%). However, only a small number (2 out of 14, 14.29%) of pregnant women with de novo VUS chose to terminate the pregnancies. Additionally, out of the 115 live births, 3 fetuses carrying VUS were born with abnormalities, that could not be definitively linked to VUS. The majority of CNVs classified as VUS are likely to have non-disease outcomes in the fetuses. Therefore, it is important to establish a VUS fetal database, adopt dynamic tracking and follow-up. This will provide more powerful clinical evidence, based on the results of fetal ultrasound and the source of VUS; which will ultimately facilitate better clinical pregnancy management decisions and reduce anxiety for pregnant women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.