ArticleScientific reports2025
An enhanced deep learning framework for intrusion classification enterprise network using multi-branch CNN-attention architecture.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- TriFusion-PCGNet: A Hybrid Multi-Branch Deep Learning Network for Energy-Aware Normal/Abnormal Heart Sound Classification.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- DTF-STCANet: A Dual Time-Frequency Swin Transformer and ConvNeXt Attention Network for Heart Sound Classification.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this work, we propose a deployment-oriented intrusion detection framework for enterprise networks, combining a multi-branch convolutional neural network (CNN) with channel attention and a fine-tuned decision-tree (DT) classifier. Our system offers transparent, human-interpretable rules with minimal inference overhead. We evaluate the proposed model on two public benchmarks: the CIC-IDS2017 dataset, consisting of over 2 million labeled network flows with 80 + features, and the NSL-KDD dataset, containing 125,000 connection records with 41 features. These datasets challenge the model with multiple flow classification tasks, including both known and unknown attack types. Our evaluation shows that the proposed model outperforms strong CNN-based baselines, achieving 99.28% accuracy and 99.30% ROC-AUC on CIC-IDS2017, with a 5.7% improvement over CNN + DT baselines. On NSL-KDD, the model attains a 99.10% accuracy and 0.997 ROC-AUC, marking a 5.7% gain compared to CNN + DT approaches. Furthermore, we report a cross-dataset transfer improvement, with a + 0.97-point increase in macro-F1 score, demonstrating the model's ability to generalize across temporal and dataset shifts. These results underline the system's effectiveness in both classification accuracy and interpretability for real-world enterprise network security deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.