ArticleScientific reports2025
Identification of prostate cancer by urinary DLX1/HOXC6 expression in Chinese population with prostate-specific antigen levels of 4-10 ng/mL.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial, but the widely used prostate-specific antigen (PSA) biomarker lacks specificity in the 4.0–10.0 ng/mL grey zone, causing many unnecessary biopsies. This study assessed urinary DLX1/HOXC6 mRNA’s diagnostic performance for PCa (both low-grade and high-grade) in Chinese men with grey-zone PSA. 584 participants with PSA 4.0–10.0 ng/mL were prospectively enrolled in two cohorts (Cohort A: n = 258; Cohort B: n = 326). Urine samples were analyzed via RT-PCR to detect DLX1/HOXC6 expression levels. A DH-Score model was developed by logistic regression and its diagnostic performance was validated. The RT-PCR assay demonstrated excellent precision, linearity, and stability against common interferents. In Cohort A, the DH-Score achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.951 (95% CI 0.917–0.974), with a sensitivity of 85.6% and a specificity of 89.1%. Validation in Cohort B showed consistent performance (AUC = 0.933, sensitivity = 84.3%, specificity = 88.7%), demonstrating robust accuracy. A negative predictive value of 85–89% could reduce unnecessary biopsies by excluding benign cases in the gray zone of the PSA. In Conclusion, DH-Score offers a non-invasive, accurate PCa risk stratification in the PSA grey zone, reducing unnecessary biopsies while preserving high diagnostic efficacy in Chinese men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.