ArticleScientific reports2025
Deep learning denoising enables rapid SEM imaging under charging conditions for FE SEM, CD SEM, and review SEM.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In scanning electron microscopy (SEM), rapid image acquisition is essential to prevent charging on non-conductive samples. However, fast acquisition often yields noisy images due to insufficient electron signal, whereas longer exposures improve quality but increase charging risk, causing distortion or signal loss. Conventional noise reduction via multi-frame averaging is effective but often impractical under low-voltage, high-speed conditions. This study evaluates four transformer-based denoising models–Restormer, NAFNet, HINet, and CGNet–applied to SEM images acquired under charging-sensitive conditions. All models were trained on an in-house paired dataset with 2-frame inputs and 32-frame references. We report full-reference metrics (PSNR/SSIM) and perceptual metrics (LPIPS/DISTS), include a small blinded MOS assessment, and use paired per-FOV statistics with 95% confidence intervals to confirm significant gains over the 2-frame baseline. While validation results were promising, performance decreased on a held-out test set of newly acquired SEM data, underscoring the need for broader data and model generalization. Among the evaluated models, NAFNet achieved the best overall fidelity and latency–approaching the 16-frame quality band with an ∼66× speed-up over 32-frame acquisition–whereas Restormer preserved circular geometry most faithfully under distribution shift; HINet and CGNet showed more visible geometric distortions. These findings clarify the practical speed–quality benefit of two-frame + AI denoising and highlight the importance of visual/perceptual evaluation alongside conventional metrics for robust deployment in FE-SEM, CD-SEM and Review-SEM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.