ArticleScientific reports2025
Entity relationship extraction method based on dependency parsing and graph neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To support campus security governance, especially campus traffic safety management, many ternary extraction techniques in knowledge graphs rely on character-level text analysis; however, the differences between word semantics and overall word meanings often lead to ambiguity and overlap in ternary extraction. Traditional methods are difficult to effectively manage overlapping relationships in text, which seriously damages the flexibility and extraction accuracy of the dataset. In addition, entity separation significantly affects entity relationship triplet extraction, and weak associations between remote entities often blur entity boundaries and reduce recall rates. This study offers the MGRel entity relationship extraction model, which integrates dependent syntactic analysis with a graph neural network to address the issues above and enhance knowledge acquisition for campus security scenarios. Firstly, by incorporating the dependent syntactic parser alongside the dual analysis mechanism of global semantic dependency and syntactic dependency, it effectively captures long-distance semantic associations and enhances entity relationship recognition accuracy; secondly, it devises the architecture of a hierarchical semantic graph convolutional neural network to facilitate the fine-grained extraction of deep implied semantic features among entities; finally, the attention-driven multi-feature fusion module is presented to improve the discriminative capacity of the ternary classifier via a noise filtering approach. The experimental results on three core general-purpose benchmark datasets-NYT, WebNLG, and DuIE-show that the F1 score of this model increases by 1.3, 0.4 and 3.2%, respectively, compared with the current optimal model, demonstrating a considerable advantage over the comparative techniques and potential value for campus security-oriented campus traffic safety applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.