Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41461820›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Neurocognitive correlates of spatial thinking mediate the relation between socioeconomic status and STEM achievement.

Jazelle Pilato, Robert Cortes, Emily Grossnickle Peterson, David Uttal, Robert Kolvoord, Adam Green

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jazelle PilatoAmerican University, Washington, DC, USA. jazellepilato@pitt.edu.
Robert CortesGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Emily Grossnickle PetersonAmerican University, Washington, DC, USA.
David UttalNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Robert KolvoordJames Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA.
Adam GreenGeorgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation DRL- 1420481National Science Foundation DRL-1420559National Science Foundation DRL-1420600
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The disparity of success in STEM between students from high and low socioeconomic backgrounds is a significant educational concern. Research in STEM education has shown that spatial skills play a role in learning, but limited research has examined whether spatial thinking could help to explain socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in STEM. The current study investigated whether spatial thinking could help to explain SES disparities, as measured by parental education and family income, across high school students' STEM achievement at the cognitive (N = 303) and neural (N = 44) levels. The current study investigated a mostly middle- and high-income sample that was highly educated (majority of parents with a bachelor's degree or higher). Results demonstrated a significant relation between SES and spatial ability, which partially mediated the relationship between SES and STEM achievement. Analysis of functional neuroimaging data during a spatial task revealed that SES was associated with increased activation in the premotor cortex and that this activity significantly mediated the SES-STEM achievement relation. These findings suggest that spatial skills are a key target to support students' STEM outcomes along the socioeconomic gradient.

Indexed as

Academic SuccessCognitionMathematicsSocial ClassThinkingAdolescentEducational StatusFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleStudents

Identifiers

PMID41461820
PMCPMC12748971

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.