Observational studyScientific reports2025
Comparative outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization versus open surgery for blunt abdominal solid organ injury with concurrent traumatic brain injury.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This retrospective observational study compared the outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) versus open surgery in patients with blunt abdominal solid organ injury (liver, spleen, or kidney; abdominal Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] ≥ 3) with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (head AIS ≥ 3), using data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank (2004-2019). Patient characteristics were adjusted using propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality; secondary endpoints included 48-h mortality, transfusion requirements, and complications. After matching, 135 patients per group were analyzed. In-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the TAE group (25/135 [18.5%] vs. 42/135 [31.1%], adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.247, 95% confidence interval 0.101-0.605, p = 0.002). TAE also showed lower 48-h mortality (10/135 [7.4%] vs. 22/135 [16.3%], AOR 0.306, p = 0.008) and transfusion rates. Complication rates were similar. Subgroup analysis showed that TAE was associated with lower mortality in non-shock (AOR 0.392, p = 0.032), elderly (AOR 0.293, p = 0.044), and focal TBI patients (AOR 0.301, p = 0.004) but not in patients with diffuse TBI. TAE may be a feasible treatment option for selected patients with blunt abdominal solid organ injury complicated by TBI, particularly in hemodynamically stable, elderly, and focal TBI patients. These findings require prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.