ArticleScientific reports2025
Computational screening and molecular modeling of probiotic-derived peptides targeting the conserved HR1 domain of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the causative agent of the global COVID-19 pandemic, relies on its spike glycoprotein to mediate host cell entry via binding to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2). The S2 subunit of the spike protein contains heptad repeat regions (HR1 and HR2) that form a six-helix bundle fusion core, a critical step for viral-host membrane fusion. This study aimed to computationally screen a library of 318 probiotic-derived bacteriocins to identify potential inhibitors targeting the conserved HR1 domain. Evaluation included historical variants (Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Kappa, Epsilon, Omicron) and currently circulating strains (BA.2.86, EG.5.1, HV.1, JN.1). Methodologies included: sequence conservation analysis via Clustal Omega, protein-peptide docking using HADDOCK 2.4 with Ambiguous Interaction Restraints derived from the HR1-HR2 complex (PDB: 6LXT), safety profiling with AlgPred, ToxinPred, HemoPred, TargetAntiAngio, and IL-4Pred, and molecular dynamics simulations (GROMACS 2020) assessing RMSD, RMSF, and hydrogen bonds. Results identified plantaricin K (2KEG) as a high-affinity binder to HR1 across all tested variants, with favorable in silico safety profiles (non-toxic, non-allergenic, non-hemolytic). Simulation data confirmed stable binding of 2KEG to HR1, supporting its role as a fusion inhibitor. These findings suggest the potential of probiotic-derived bacteriocins, particularly 2KEG, as broad-spectrum antiviral candidates against SARS-CoV-2. Further experimental studies are required to validate these computational predictions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.