Trial reportScientific reports2025
Long-term effects of bifrontal transcranial alternating current stimulation on verbal working memory and episodic memory in young healthy adults.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Haemodynamic correlates of bilateral 6 Hz transcranial alternating current stimulation during working memory enhancement revealed by fNIRS.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current randomized controlled trial (RCT) examined both immediate and long-term effects of five consecutive bifrontal tACS sessions on verbal WM functioning in 30 healthy adult participants. WM performance and event-related quantitative electroencephalography (qEEG) parameters (mean power of frontal theta oscillations during three different WM events) were noted at baseline, immediately after tACS intervention, and at four-week post intervention. In comparison to the sham-tACS group, WM performance in active tACS group was improved following a four-week post-intervention period across all WM events, but not immediately after tACS intervention. Left prefrontal theta power in the active group decreased immediately after the intervention (in comparison to baseline) and remained low at four weeks, while the sham group returned to high theta-power baseline levels. Additionally, at four weeks post-intervention, participants in the active group demonstrated higher episodic memory accuracy compared to the sham group, which was associated with lower frontal theta power during WM encoding events. These findings are consistent with the hypothesized long-term plasticity effects. The current results highlight the role of event-related prefrontal theta power modulation in enhancing verbal WM and episodic memory retrieval in humans acutely, and over time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.