ArticleScientific reports2025
Effect of hybrid fibre reinforcement and rubber aggregates on the flexural performance of reinforced concrete beams.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research examines the effect of incorporating hybrid fibres and rubber aggregates on the flexural behaviour of reinforced concrete beams. Rubber shreds, prepared from waste conveyor belts and coated with sand to enhance bonding, were used as partial replacements for coarse aggregates at levels of 2.5%, 5%, and 7.5%. Additionally, glass fibre and polypropylene fibres were introduced into the concrete mix at dosages of 0.3% at different combinations, including PP 70% + Glass 30%, PP 60% + Glass 40%, PP 50% + Glass 50%, PP 40% + Glass 60%, and PP 30% + Glass 70%. A total of eighteen reinforced concrete beams were cast for this investigation, each with dimensions of 250 mm × 150 mm × 3000 mm. The beams were subjected to four-point bending tests over a clear span of 2800 mm to evaluate their flexural response. Values such as first crack load, deflection at first crack, yield load, deflection at yield, ultimate load, and deflection at ultimate were recorded. Load-deflection curves were plotted for all beam types. The results revealed that beams incorporating both sand-coated rubber shreds and hybrid fibres generally exhibited improved flexural performance compared to conventional concrete beams and those containing only rubber aggregates. Specifically, the beam containing 7.5% sand coated rubber and hybrid fibres (40% polypropylene + 60%glass fibres) showed notable improvement, with the first crack load increasing by 29.77%, deflection at first crack load by 21.47%, yield load by 52.86%, deflection at yield load by 28.73%, ultimate load by 14.32% and deflection at load by 53.84 relative to the control specimens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.