ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of a machine learning-based model for predicting the functional outcome of patients with proximal femur fractures.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early-stage rehabilitation is crucial for the functional recovery of patients with proximal femur fractures. Predicting functional prognosis at such an early stage can simplify the process of planning for transfers and discharge destinations, as well as setting rehabilitation goals. The current study aimed to develop a model using machine learning to predict the functional prognosis of patients with proximal femur fractures based on parameters at the time of hospital admission. Our research utilized a dataset from 3,088 proximal femur fracture cases recorded in the Japan Association of Rehabilitation Database. The dependent variable was the level of independence in daily living (ADL) activities at discharge, categorized into nine classes. A regression model was implemented by approximating the dependent variable to a continuous value. Accuracy and Quadratic Weighted Kappa (QWK) were used to evaluate the prediction accuracy, and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) values were used to evaluate the model's predictive explainability. The machine learning model exhibited an Accuracy of 0.340 and a QWK of 0.657, indicating solid agreement. The top parameters according to SHAP values were the total Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score and the level of independence in ADL in elderly with dementia. We developed a machine learning model capable of predicting the independence level in daily activities at discharge, utilizing patient data available at hospital admission for those suffering from proximal femur fractures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.