ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting natural enemy efficacy in biological control using ex-ante analyses.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Massive losses in agricultural and natural systems accrue globally due to invasive species, and yet the success rate of natural enemy introductions to control them is low. The high failure rate is due to the unknown efficacy of the introduced natural enemies. Furthermore, reviews of prior biological control efforts have not led to the development of assessment methods to predict their pre-release efficacy. To demonstrate a potential solution, we deconstructed the biological control of the invasive cassava mealybug (CM) and cassava green mite (CGM) in Africa using weather-driven metapopulation tri-trophic physiologically based demographic models (PBDMs). Bioeconomic analysis of the simulation results enabled parsing the contributions of the introduced natural enemies and endemic fungal pathogens to the control of CM and CGM and to the recovery of cassava yield across the vast ecological zones of Africa. The analysis shows that ex-ante pre-release analyses of natural enemy efficacy would have correctly predicted the biological control of the two pests. PBDM analyses of other biological control programs explained their success and/or failure. The results suggest well-parameterized mechanistic models can predict pre-release the efficacy of natural enemies and become an important instrument in increasing global food security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.