Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41461781›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for the detection of fear using parameterized quantum circuits.

José L Gómez-Sirvent, Antonio Fernández-Caballero, Paulo Novais

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

José L Gómez-SirventNeurocognition and Emotion Unit, Instituto de Investigación en Informática de Albacete, 02071, Albacete, Spain. jose.gomez@uclm.es.
Antonio Fernández-CaballeroNeurocognition and Emotion Unit, Instituto de Investigación en Informática de Albacete, 02071, Albacete, Spain.
Paulo NovaisALGORITMI Research Centre/LASI, Universidade do Minho, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación BES-2021-097834Agencia Estatal de Investigación PID2023-149753OB-C21Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha 2025-GRIN-3844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Excessive fear in response to certain stimuli may be a key indicator of anxiety disorders. Its detection makes it valuable for the diagnosis and treatment of such pathologies. Quantum computing has shown promising results in processing different types of brain signals. However, its potential for functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals remains largely unexplored. The present study investigates the application of parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) for the detection of fear in fNIRS data. To this end, two different quantum architectures and quantum kernels are presented and tested on a publicly available fNIRS dataset. The proposed models are evaluated for subject-dependent and subject-independent classification by cross-validation to measure their performance under different conditions. The cross-validation results showed good performance of the proposed architectures even when trained on a very small dataset. Both analyzed quantum kernels showed high performance as feature extractors. Surprisingly, the subject-dependent approach achieved superior results despite using a training set more than 20 times smaller than that of the subject-independent approach. These results emphasize the power of quantum models in the classification of fNIRS signals and open new avenues for the analysis of this type of brain signals beyond the limitations of classical approaches.

Indexed as

BrainFearAdultHumansMaleQuantum TheorySpectroscopy, Near-InfraredFear detectionFunctional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)Parameterized quantum circuitsQuantum machine learning

Identifiers

PMID41461781
PMCPMC12748957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.