ArticleScientific reports2025
Functional near-infrared spectroscopy for the detection of fear using parameterized quantum circuits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Excessive fear in response to certain stimuli may be a key indicator of anxiety disorders. Its detection makes it valuable for the diagnosis and treatment of such pathologies. Quantum computing has shown promising results in processing different types of brain signals. However, its potential for functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) signals remains largely unexplored. The present study investigates the application of parameterized quantum circuits (PQCs) for the detection of fear in fNIRS data. To this end, two different quantum architectures and quantum kernels are presented and tested on a publicly available fNIRS dataset. The proposed models are evaluated for subject-dependent and subject-independent classification by cross-validation to measure their performance under different conditions. The cross-validation results showed good performance of the proposed architectures even when trained on a very small dataset. Both analyzed quantum kernels showed high performance as feature extractors. Surprisingly, the subject-dependent approach achieved superior results despite using a training set more than 20 times smaller than that of the subject-independent approach. These results emphasize the power of quantum models in the classification of fNIRS signals and open new avenues for the analysis of this type of brain signals beyond the limitations of classical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.