ArticleScientific reports2025
Biomechanical effects of insole material stiffness on the human foot: a finite element analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pregnancy-related transverse arch deformation: a subject-specific finite element analysis of the contributions of body weight and tissue stiffness.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Arch-supports and plantar fasciitis: A prospective study incorporating patient-reported outcomes and finite element analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional insoles are widely used to redistribute plantar pressure and support the medial arch; however, the biomechanical effects of insole material stiffness remain unclear. This study employed finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the relationship between insole stiffness and foot tissue loading, providing a theoretical basis for personalized insole design and clinical application. A three-dimensional finite element model of a healthy 26‑year‑old male foot and insole was reconstructed from CT images. Exploring the trend of the insole material stiffness on foot biomechanics through parametric analysis. Six insole materials with elastic moduli of 100, 260, 1,000, 3,000, 5,000, and 500,000 MPa-were analyzed, The Poisson's ratio for all insole materials was assumed to be 0.45. Two loading conditions, static bilateral stance and gait forefoot contact, were simulated to evaluate foot displacement, plantar stress, and stresses on the medial process of the calcaneal tuberosity and metatarsals. The finite element model demonstrated good agreement with experimental plantar pressure measurements, the experimentally measured peak plantar pressure was 0.2217 MPa, while the finite element model calculated a value of 0.234 MPa, with a relative error of approximately 2%. Both high-stress regions were located at the central area of the heel, and the stress distribution trends were consistent, indicating that the model validation is effective. Increasing insole stiffness reduced foot displacement (48.0%), plantar peak stress (47.5%), calcaneal peak stress (30.8%), and metatarsal peak stress (20.8%). When the elastic modulus exceeded approximately 3,000 MPa, further biomechanical benefits plateaued, indicating a diminishing marginal effect. This study quantitatively characterizes the intrinsic relationship between insole stiffness and foot biomechanics under static and dynamic conditions. The findings provide robust biomechanical evidence to guide personalized insole design, prevent soft tissue overload, and support the clinical application of functional insoles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.