ArticleScientific reports2025
Predicting sugar beet leaf area index: evaluating performance of double sigmoid functions under different irrigation and plant density scenarios.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The leaf area index (LAI) dynamics in sugar beet follow a double sigmoidal curve, modeled as the subtraction of two sigmoid functions. In this study, we examined the accuracy of 15 different sigmoid functions in describing the sugar beet LAI variation based on growing degree days (GDD) and days after planting (DAP) in different irrigation treatments and crop densities under direct and transplant cultivation. The results showed that the Logistic-Richards (LR) and Hill-Hill functions (HH) effectively modeled the measured LAI data over the GDD and DAP-based growing period for both direct sowing and transplant cultivation. The LR (NRMSE = 0.04, d = 0.99, MRE = -0.006) and HH (NRMSE = 0.05, d = 0.99, MRE = -0.01) achieved the best performance for direct sowing calibration based on GDD. In contrast, the Von Bertalanffy, Weibull, and Hill functions were not suitable for describing sugar beet LAI dynamics. Adjusting function coefficients to account for environmental factors such as seasonal applied water, rainfall, and planting density generally led to decreased predictive accuracy, under direct and transplant cultivation. Therefore, LR functions can be valuable for modelling sugar beet LAI variation under various irrigation treatments and crop densities throughout the growing season.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.