ArticleScientific reports2025
Ultrasound and SWE-based transfer learning for predicting fibrotic NASH.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop a combined deep-learning model utilizing liver ultrasound, liver elastography images, and clinical features to predict and diagnose fibrotic non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). A rat model of liver steatosis and fibrosis was established through a high-fat diet and subcutaneous CCl₄ injections. Two-dimensional ultrasound and shear wave elastography (SWE) images were acquired. Three deep learning models, based on the ResNet-18 architecture, were designed: (1) a pure image model using only liver ultrasound, (2) a pure image model using only liver elastography, and (3) a combined model incorporating liver ultrasound, liver elastography images, and clinical features. The performance of these models was evaluated using three-fold cross-validation, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA), and calibration curves. The combined deep learning model demonstrated the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.879. DCA revealed that the multimodal model provided superior net benefits across most threshold probability ranges for predicting and diagnosing fibrotic NASH. The combined deep learning model based on the ResNet-18 architecture exhibits promising performance in predicting and diagnosing fibrotic NASH.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.