Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41461736›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A hierarchical competing risks survival model in the study of child mortality in Bangladesh.

Nazmul Haque, Mohammad Anamul Haque, Sheikh Sifat Sadikeen, Md Jamal Uddin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nazmul Haque *Department of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, 3114, Bangladesh.
Mohammad Anamul Haque *Department of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, 3114, Bangladesh.
Sheikh Sifat SadikeenDepartment of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, 3114, Bangladesh.
Md Jamal UddinDepartment of Statistics, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, 3114, Bangladesh. jamal-sta@sust.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under-five child mortality remains a significant public health issue in Bangladesh and other developing countries. Identifying key risk factors within a hierarchical data structure is crucial for improving health system performance. This study employed the Fine-Gray Frailty (FGF) model to Bangladesh Demographic and Health Survey (BDHS) data to assess child mortality from disease-related causes, treating non-disease-related deaths as competing risks in hierarchical framework. The model was also applied by considering non-disease deaths as the main event in a subsequent analysis. Findings reveal that maternal age, child sex, birth order, and regional variation remain significant determinants of mortality after adjusting for the hierarchical data structure. Children of mothers older than 30 years face a significantly higher risk of non-disease deaths compared with those aged 20-30 years. Male children experience higher mortality than females for both disease and non-disease causes. Higher birth order is associated with a lower risk of non-disease mortality. Regionally, Khulna shows a significantly increasing hazard of non-disease deaths than Barisal. This study underscores the value of hierarchical competing risk models for guiding targeted public health interventions.

Indexed as

Child MortalityAdolescentAdultBangladeshChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMaternal AgeRisk FactorsYoung AdultChild mortalityCompeting risksCumulative incidence functionFrailty modelHierarchical likelihood

Identifiers

PMID41461736
PMCPMC12749043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.