ArticleScientific reports2025
Lightweight neural networks with anti-colored noise for bearing fault diagnosis using deep separable convolution and transfer learning.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Practical bearing fault diagnosis faces several key challenges: noise interference, performance degradation under varying operating conditions, and slow diagnostic speed. For such engineering problems, this article combines deeply separable convolution to establish three lightweight neural network fault diagnosis models-MobileNet-DLCNN, ShuffleNet-DLCNN and SqueezeNet-DLCNN. At the same time, the failure mechanism of rolling bearings is studied. This article incorporates colored noise into the standard bearing failure datasets from Case Western Reserve University (CWRU) and the American Society for Machinery Failure Prevention Technology (MFPT), and conducts noise resistance training under variable adaptive characteristics, compares the diagnostic ability with the datasets before adding colored noise. Then, the identification and classification abilities of the three lightweight convolution models proposed under each dataset, as well as the transfer learning adaptive ability of the three models between different datasets and working conditions, are verified through comparative experiments. The experimental results show that SqueezeNet-DLCNN has the best diagnostic performance among the three models, and it can complete the recognition and classification of all data in about one minute with an accuracy of 97%. The lightweight convolution designed in this article has the advantages of strong noise resistance, high efficiency, and fast speed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.