ArticleLife science alliance2026
In vivo screen reveals specific roles of Hippo pathway components in development and regeneration.
Article in Life science alliance, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Hippo signalling pathway is a major regulator of regeneration and development. However, the comparative importance and functional roles of individual Hippo pathway components in vivo are greatly unknown, particularly within the vertebrate lineage. To gain direct and comparable insights, we took advantage of the zebrafish larva model system. We generated individual and combined CRISPR/Cas9 F0 knockouts of a range of core Hippo pathway genes, including upstream regulators, the co-transcriptional regulators Yap1/Taz, and Yap1/Taz target genes. We analysed and compared the resulting developmental and regenerative phenotypes. Our findings highlight that paralogues of core components have distinct, but in some instances overlapping, functions. Intriguingly, we find that Yap1 and Taz have differential roles during development and regeneration. In addition, we characterise and compare two tail fin regenerative paradigms: after both severe and mild injury. These injury paradigms are drastically different and elicit diverse resolution processes. We confirm critical roles of the immune system in the regenerative process. Macrophage recruitment is reduced during severe tail fin regeneration after Yap1 and Taz loss, appearing earlier in
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.