ReviewZhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology2025
[Diagnosis and treatment of liver diseases in the era of artificial intelligence].
Review in Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has shown great potential in the field of hepatology, and it is gradually revolutionizing novel research for liver diseases. However, its full integration into real-world diagnostic and treatment processes still faces significant challenges. This article analyzed the application progress of AI in key areas such as big data analysis, translational research, and imaging and pathological interpretation. Physicians need to integrate massive amounts of multimodal data (medical history, physical signs, laboratory data, imaging, and pathology) to make informed decisions in clinical practice. Although AI has gradually shown a preliminary auxiliary application role in certain liver disease diagnosis and treatment scenarios, current machine learning and deep learning technologies are far from being able to effectively support clinical decision-making in real-world settings. The core pain points are as follows: firstly, AI tools are not yet mature enough to truly independently and reliably assist in complex clinical evaluation; secondly, even if assistance is provided, the ultimate responsibility for medical decisions still clearly belongs to the physician, failing to reduce their workload effectively; finally, due to the different specialties and data characteristics of various medical centers, individually trained AI models are often relatively independent and personalized, fragmented, and difficult to integrate into a widely applicable and scalable multi-center general model, limiting their universal value. In the future, enhancing clinicians' understanding of AI and building multidisciplinary collaborative networks will be crucial to accelerating the development of AI-driven decision support tools for specific liver diseases. At the same time, ethical, legal, and talent development challenges, and others must be carefully addressed to bridge the gap and safely and eppectively apply AI in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.