ReviewAnatomy & cell biology2026
Review of cadaver preservative solution from biomedical aspect.
Review in Anatomy & cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of cadavers remains essential for medical students studying anatomy, as it provides irreplaceable hands-on experience. Given that the available cadavers must be reused over time, an effective preservation method is necessary to maintain tissue integrity. Formaldehyde-based solutions are commonly used in cadaver preservation due to their cost-effectiveness, practicality, and long-term tissue stability. However, given formaldehyde is carcinogenic and an irritant, it poses risks to both users and preserved cadavers. As a result, numerous studies have investigated cadaver embalming techniques as an effort to safeguard users and preserve cadavers. This review examines research on low-formaldehyde embalming solutions. Literature was retrieved from databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Wiley Online Library, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect, with a focus on preservation efficacy, safety, and practical application. The reviewed literature identifies several low-formaldehyde formulations that effectively preserve cadavers while minimizing health risks. These solutions offer a variety of chemical compositions and application methods for institutes seeking safer cadaver preservation. The findings emphasize the need for anatomy instruction to switch to low-formaldehyde embalming. These approaches can preserve cadavers and reduce health hazards, but cost and resource availability remain important consideration. Further study is needed to enhance low-formaldehyde embalming solutions for anatomical institutes' different needs. This review concludes that low-formaldehyde embalming solutions are essential for cadaver preservation safety. This study helps anatomy professionals modify embalming practices in their institutions to improve cadaver preservation and user safety by revealing the benefits and downsides of several options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.