ArticleJournal of affective disorders2026
Data-driven symptom dimensions reveal familial patterns in bipolar disorder.
Article in Journal of affective disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBipolar disorder (BD) is a highly heritable psychiatric illness whose clinical and genetic heterogeneity complicates efforts to identify biologically-relevant subtypes. Traditional categorical approaches often fail to capture the multidimensional nature of BD symptomatology. This study aimed to evaluate whether data-driven dimensions show familial aggregation, suggesting potential genetic underpinnings.
methodsUsing two independent cohorts: a primary sample from Halifax (N = 368) and a replication sample from the NIMH Genetics Initiative Bipolar Disorder Consortium (N = 1356), latent dimensions were derived from 21 clinical variables with principal component analysis (PCA). The similarity of relatives in the PCA-derived space was quantified and compared to their similarity with unrelated BD subjects. Mixed-effects models assessed whether familial similarity on latent dimensions increased with degree of relatedness.
resultsAcross both cohorts, the first two principal components (PCs; i.e., mood episode frequency and age of illness onset) were consistent. Overall clinical phenotype was more similar among relatives than among unrelated cases (Halifax: β = 0.316, p = 0.025; NIMH: β = 0.406, p < 0.001; Combined: β = 0.388, p < 0.001). PC 2 (onset) showed significant familial similarity in both cohorts, and PC 1 (episode frequency) showed similarity in the NIMH sample.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that latent clinical dimensions, especially those reflecting mood episode recurrence and age of onset, aggregate within families and may reflect underlying genetic liability in BD. Dimensional, data-driven phenotypes could provide more genetically informative traits than traditional diagnostic subtypes and offer promising targets for future genetic and neurobiological research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.