ArticleJMIR formative research2025
Assessing Patient Acceptance of Being Offered a Virtual Calm Room in Psychiatric Inpatient Care: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Implementing new technologies in health care settings is often a complex and challenging process. Virtual reality (VR) has demonstrated promising results in terms of feasibility, acceptability, and effectiveness across various health conditions. VR can provide calming environments to enhance patients' well-being in psychiatric inpatient care. However, little research has been done on patients' acceptance of VR technology in psychiatric care in the real-world setting. Objective: This study aimed to explore patients' experiences of being offered the use of a virtual calm room when feeling anxious or worried in a psychiatric inpatient setting. Methods: A mixed methods design was used, with a qualitative to quantitative approach. The data were gathered through individual interviews (n=10) and a 3-item rating scale ranging from 1 to 5 (n=59). The qualitative findings were then validated within a larger population using the quantitative data. Results: The majority of participants reported being satisfied with the option of using VR. Their initial impressions of the virtual calm room were that it seemed like a creative and stimulating environment that could potentially have a positive impact on them. They expected the VR experience to enhance their feelings of relaxation and concentration. The participants highlighted human interaction as a particularly valuable aspect to consider when implementing VR, emphasizing its role in enhancing the overall experience and ensuring a sense of connection and support throughout the process. Participants were generally positive in the answers to the survey with a high score of feeling VR to be a modern method to manage anxiety (mean 4.3, SD 0.98), low levels of experiencing difficulty (mean 2.1, SD 1.4), and would generally consider future use (mean 4.4, SD 1.1). Conclusions: The qualitative findings highlighted patients' openness to innovative methods for enhancing their engagement in the psychiatric inpatient setting. Patients expressed a desire for increased availability of the virtual calm room. However, maintaining a balance between innovative technologies and human support is crucial for the successful implementation of such methods. Quantitative results demonstrated high acceptance of the option of using the virtual calm room, with no significant difficulties reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.