Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41460955›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Cell-DINO: Self-supervised image-based embeddings for cell fluorescent microscopy.

Théo Moutakanni, Camille Couprie, Seungeun Yi, Michael Doron, Zitong S Chen, Nikita Moshkov, Elouan Gardes, Mathilde Caron, Hugo Touvron, Armand Joulin and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Deep Learning for Localization Microscopy in 2D and 3D.Accounts of chemical research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Théo MoutakanniMeta Platforms Inc., FAIR, Paris, France.
Camille CouprieMeta Platforms Inc., FAIR, Paris, France.
Seungeun YiMeta Platforms Inc., FAIR, Paris, France.
Michael DoronBroad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Zitong S ChenBroad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0009-4335-9922
Nikita MoshkovHelmholtz Munich, Institute of Computational Biology, Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5823-4884
Elouan GardesMeta Platforms Inc., FAIR, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0000-2953-0345
Mathilde CaronGoogle LLC DeepMind, Paris, France.
Hugo TouvronMeta Platforms Inc., FAIR, Paris, France.
Armand JoulinGoogle LLC DeepMind, Paris, France.
Piotr BojanowskiMeta Platforms Inc., FAIR, Paris, France.
Wolfgang M PerniceColumbia University Irving Medical Center, Neurology, New York, New York, United States of America.
Juan C CaicedoMorgridge Institute for Research, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1277-4631

Funding

Integrated morphological and transcriptomic single-cell profiling of patient-derived cells as a platform for genomic and translational medicineR00HG011488 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PERNICE, WOLFGANG MAXIMILIAN ANTON · 2023 to 2025
$726k
Deep-learning based profiling of patient-derived cells as a tool for genomic and translational medicineK99HG011488 · NHGRI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI PERNICE, WOLFGANG MAXIMILIAN ANTON · 2021 to 2022
$196k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG011488NHGRI NIH HHS R00 HG011488
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately quantifying cellular morphology at scale could substantially empower existing single-cell approaches. However, measuring cell morphology remains an active field of research, which has inspired multiple computer vision algorithms over the years. Here, we show that DINOv2, a vision-transformer based, self-supervised algorithm, has a remarkable ability for learning rich representations of cellular morphology without manual annotations or any other type of supervision. We apply DINOv2 to cell phenotyping problems, and compare the performance of resulting models, called Cell-DINO models, on a wide variety of tasks across two publicly available imaging datasets of diverse specifications and biological focus. Compared to supervised and other self-supervised baselines, Cell-DINO models demonstrate improved performance, especially in low annotation regimes. For instance, to classify protein localization using only 1% of annotations on a challenging single-cell dataset, Cell-DINO performs 70% better than a supervised strategy, and 24% better than another self-supervised alternative. The results show that Cell-DINO can support the study of unknown biological variation, including single-cell heterogeneity and relationships between experimental conditions, making it an excellent tool for image-based biological discovery.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSingle-Cell AnalysisAlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansMicroscopy, FluorescenceSupervised Machine Learning

Identifiers

PMID41460955
PMCPMC12826486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.