ArticleCirculation2026
Deep Learning-Based Continuous QT Monitoring to Identify High-Risk Prolongation Events After Class III Antiarrhythmic Initiation.
Article in Circulation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Precision Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Atrial Fibrillation: From Recurrence Prediction to Comparative Treatment Selection.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Article
- Artificial intelligence and the evolution of the electrocardiogram: from cardiovascular diagnostic tool to digital biomarker.European heart journal. Digital health · 2026Review
- From Molecules to Machines: An Integrative Framework Linking Molecular Pathogenesis, Multi-Factorial Risk, Risk Stratification, Clinical Management, and Artificial Intelligence in QT Prolongation and Sudden Cardiac Death.Clinical cardiology · 2026Review
- The present and future of antiarrhythmic drugs.JRSM cardiovascular diseaseArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDrug-induced QT prolongation after successful inpatient loading of class III antiarrhythmics may occur during routine outpatient care. Insertable cardiac monitors offer continuous signals but are limited by single-lead configuration. We hypothesized that a spatially aware deep learning system (3DRECON-QT) can reconstruct spatial information from a single lead vector to quantify QT/QTc and identify high-risk prolongation.
methodsWe developed 3DRECON-QT using a multitask encoder-decoder that ingests a 10-s single-lead signal, reconstructs 12 leads, and predicts QT/QTc. The model was developed using 12-lead ECGs with clinician-adjudicated QT/RR from a large health system and tested in an external center with different ECG hardware. Continuous monitoring performance was assessed in a public dofetilide-loading data set with serial ECGs. In a real-world cohort of outpatients on dofetilide or sotalol presenting to the hospital or emergency room for any reason, rates of ventricular arrhythmias and QT prolongation were assessed. Device validation was tested in patients with insertable cardiac monitor recordings paired with clinical 12-lead ECGs.
results3DRECON-QT classified prolonged QTc from single-lead signals with area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.942 (mean absolute error, 17.5 ms) in the internal test set and 0.943 (mean absolute error, 21.1 ms) externally. During continuous dofetilide monitoring, predictions correlated with ground truth (
conclusionsA single-lead, deep-learning approach can achieve guideline-level measurement accuracy, enable continuous QTc surveillance from nonstandard ECG vectors, and identify clinically meaningful outpatient QTc prolongation associated with a >4-fold increase in serious ventricular arrhythmias. This strategy may enhance safety monitoring after class III antiarrhythmic initiation and support targeted intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.