ArticlePloS one2025
Development of an automated ultrasonographic detection method for fecal retention using a transgluteal cleft approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence-based classification system using ultrasound images obtained via a transgluteal cleft scanning approach for detecting fecal retention in the lower rectum. The goal was to support accurate, objective constipation assessment by nurses in home care settings, where traditional diagnostic tools are often unavailable. Ultrasound videos of the lower rectum were collected from 24 patients undergoing dialysis at a mixed-care hospital. From 90 videos, 2,855 still images were extracted and labeled by expert sonographers based on the presence or absence of hyperechoic areas indicating fecal retention. A deep learning segmentation model using U-Net with a ResNeXt-50 encoder was trained and evaluated. Performance was measured using the intersection over union threshold of 0.5 to define true positives. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated on a test dataset of 758 images. Among the test images, 376 (49.6%) showed fecal retention. The AI system achieved a sensitivity of 81.6%, specificity of 84.0%, and overall accuracy of 82.8%. The mean IoU was 0.601 ± 0.185, indicating a high level of agreement between expert annotations and AI-generated predictions. The tool reliably detected fecal retention in ultrasound images obtained using the transgluteal cleft approach, which overcomes limitations of traditional transabdominal scanning caused by obesity, bladder emptying, or bowel gas. The proposed AI-assisted ultrasound system showed high diagnostic performance in identifying fecal retention in the lower rectum. It may enable non-specialist nurses to assess constipation more safely and accurately, particularly in home-care environments. This technology has the potential to reduce unnecessary laxative use and invasive interventions, ultimately improving the quality of bowel care for older adults with impaired communication or mobility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.