ArticlePloS one2025
The role of internet integration in relation to farmers' income and perceived social fairness.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does getting online help low-income adults eat better? Digital access and BMI-based nutritional imbalance in China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates how Internet embeddedness moderates the relationship between farmers' income and perceived social fairness in rural China through the integrated lens of social comparison and relative deprivation theories. Analyzing 1,036 rural households in Sichuan Province via Oprobit regression with instrumental variables, we find that while absolute income growth positively affects PSF, Internet usage significantly weakens this relationship through three mechanisms: (1) expanded reference groups that facilitate upward social comparisons, (2) algorithmic distortion of economic reality through selective content exposure, and (3) cognitive overload from excessive income-related information. These findings reconcile conflicting evidence in the income-fairness literature by demonstrating how digital connectivity transforms traditional comparison processes. This study contributes to development economics by highlighting the dual role of technology in rural welfare, while enabling information access, it may inadvertently undermine fairness perceptions through psychological and algorithmic channels. The policy implications suggest the need to complement income growth strategies with digital literacy programs and platform governance to mitigate comparison biases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.