ArticlePloS one2025
Collaborative scheduling of dual-trolley quay cranes and AGVs via speed-control strategy.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conflicts may impede AGVs from reaching DQCs promptly during automated terminal operations. This challenge may lead to congestion on the transfer platform and diminish the operational efficiency of unmanned terminals. This research proposes a cooperative scheduling approach integrating a speed control strategy for DQCs and AGVs. Considering the capacity of transfer platforms, time windows for AGVs are established, and tasks are allocated accordingly. A speed control-based conflict resolution model is created with the dual objectives of minimizing energy consumption during travel and maximizing the fulfillment of time windows. The Dijkstra algorithm is employed to plan travel routes, anticipate potential conflicts during AGV operations, and assign priorities based on the satisfaction of task time windows. AGV speeds are dynamically adjusted to generate conflict-free scheduling plans that align with the operational times of the dual-trolley quay cranes. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed speed-control strategy effectively resolves conflicts while consuming less energy than traditional stop-and-wait methods. Additionally, this strategy reduces the frequency of AGV starts and stops, ensures timely task completion, decreases quay crane waiting times, and enhances overall terminal operational efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.