ArticlePloS one2025
Automated detection and quantification of two-spotted spider mite life stages using computer vision for high-throughput in vitro assays.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae Koch) is a globally significant agricultural pest with high reproductive capacity, rapid development, and frequent evolution of miticide resistance. Breeding and selection of resistant host cultivars represent a promising complement to chemical control, but widespread adoption is limited primarily due to the labor-intensive nature of conventional in vitro phenotyping methods. Here, we present a high-throughput, semi-automated image analysis pipeline integrating the Blackbird CNC Microscopy Imaging Robot with computer vision models for mite life stage identification. We developed a publicly available dataset of over 1,500 annotated images (nearly 32,000 labeled instances) spanning five biologically relevant classes across 10 host species and >25 cultivars. Three YOLO11-based object detection models (three-, four-, and five-class configurations) were trained and evaluated using real and synthetic data. The three-class model achieved the highest overall performance on the hold out test set (precision = 0.875, recall = 0.871, mAP50 = 0.883), with detection accuracy robust to host background and moderate object densities. Application to miticidal assays demonstrated reliable fecundity estimation but reduced accuracy for mortality assessment due to misclassification of dead mites. In hop cultivar assays, the pipeline detected significant differences in fecundity, aligning with manual counts (R2 [Formula: see text] 0.98). Performance declined on hosts absent from training data and at densities exceeding [Formula: see text]80 objects per image, underscoring the need for host-specific fine-tuning and density-aware assay experimental design. By enabling rapid, standardized, and reproducible quantification of mite life stages, this system offers a scalable alternative to manual scoring, particularly for resistance breeding programs targeting antibiosis traits. Our approach addresses major throughput bottlenecks in T. urticae phenotyping and establishes a framework for integrating automated imaging into broader pest management and plant breeding pipelines. Dataset, code, and trained models are publicly available to facilitate adoption and extension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.