Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41460802›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2025

Towards responsible surveillance in preventive health data-AI research.

Sam H A Muller, Johannes J M van Delden, Ghislaine J M W van Thiel, Hypermarker Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sam H A MullerJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1800-5443
Johannes J M van DeldenJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Ghislaine J M W van ThielJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hypermarker Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into health data research promises to transform precision medicine, especially by managing complex and chronic conditions like hypertension through decision support. Yet health AI also furthers surveillance, with serious ethical and social impact. Nevertheless, surveillance in health, in particular data-AI research and innovation, is understudied. This paper provides a conceptual analysis of health data-AI surveillance using the Hypermarker research project as a case study. We trace the evolution of surveillance within medicine, public health, data-driven research, and the proliferation of digital health technologies, before examining how the development of AI technologies amplifies and transforms these existing practices. We analyse health data-AI surveillance's implications of pervasiveness and unobtrusiveness, hypercollection and function creep, hypervisibility and profiling, informational power, and the formation of a surveillant assemblage, followed by an assessment of the safeguards and measures implemented by the Hypermarker project. Our analysis exposes several key challenges for responsible surveillance practices in health data-AI research: strengthening trustworthiness through fairness and equity, ensuring accountability through transparency, and fostering public control and oversight. To this end, we recommend advancing responsible governance by implementing arrangements such as community advisory panels, independent review boards and oversight bodies, data-AI justice frameworks and dialogues, transparency dashboards and public AI portals, stewardship committees, accountability assemblies, and open oversight cycles.

Identifiers

PMID41460802
PMCPMC12747365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.