ArticlePLOS digital health2025
Towards responsible surveillance in preventive health data-AI research.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into health data research promises to transform precision medicine, especially by managing complex and chronic conditions like hypertension through decision support. Yet health AI also furthers surveillance, with serious ethical and social impact. Nevertheless, surveillance in health, in particular data-AI research and innovation, is understudied. This paper provides a conceptual analysis of health data-AI surveillance using the Hypermarker research project as a case study. We trace the evolution of surveillance within medicine, public health, data-driven research, and the proliferation of digital health technologies, before examining how the development of AI technologies amplifies and transforms these existing practices. We analyse health data-AI surveillance's implications of pervasiveness and unobtrusiveness, hypercollection and function creep, hypervisibility and profiling, informational power, and the formation of a surveillant assemblage, followed by an assessment of the safeguards and measures implemented by the Hypermarker project. Our analysis exposes several key challenges for responsible surveillance practices in health data-AI research: strengthening trustworthiness through fairness and equity, ensuring accountability through transparency, and fostering public control and oversight. To this end, we recommend advancing responsible governance by implementing arrangements such as community advisory panels, independent review boards and oversight bodies, data-AI justice frameworks and dialogues, transparency dashboards and public AI portals, stewardship committees, accountability assemblies, and open oversight cycles.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.