ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2026
Differences in Breast Cancer Care Between Rural Women Undergoing Treatment at a Referral Center and Those Treated Locally.
Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Letter Comments on: Differences in Breast Cancer Care Between Rural Women Undergoing Treatment at a Referral Center and Those Treated Locally.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReferral of rural women to specialty centers may change breast cancer treatment and improve outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate breast cancer care among rural women treated at their diagnosing institution (non-referred women [NRW]) compared with those treated at another facility after diagnosis (referred women [RW]).
methodsWomen from rural zip codes with stages I to III breast cancer were identified from the National Cancer Database, 2010-2021. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics were compared.
resultsOf 184,156 rural women, 11 % were RW. The referral rate increased from 7 % in 2010 to 14 % in 2021 (p < 0.0001). On multivariable analysis, referred women were less likely to be black or have ER+HER2+ or clinical N2 disease. Referred women were more likely to be of Asian race or Hispanic ethnicity or to have larger clinical tumor size or ER-HER2- disease. Referred women were less likely to undergo breast-conserving surgery (BCS) (52 % vs 60 %), receive post-BCS radiation (79 % vs 86 %), or receive endocrine therapy (81 % vs 85 %) (all p < 0.001). Referred women were more likely to undergo reconstruction (41 % vs 32 %) and travel ≥50 miles (45 % vs 28 %) (all p < 0.001). Referred women more often had ≥60 days from diagnosis to first treatment (22 % vs 13 %; p < 0.0001).
conclusionsReferral of rural women for breast cancer treatment is increasing. Differences exist between RW and NRW with regard to race/ethnicity, distance to facility, tumor characteristics, and treatment. Further investigation into the underlying causes of these differences may identify opportunities to ensure that rural women have timely access to the full spectrum of treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460623What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.