Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41460511›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2026

Assessment of Structured Tele-Critical Care Training and Its Impact on Clinician's Perceptions of Delivery of Care: A Survey-Based Pilot Study.

Nasim Motayar, Krzysztof Laudanski, Huijun Xiao, Xiaofeng F Wang, Hesham A Hassaballa, Carrie L Griffiths, Elizabeth A Scruth, Fiona A Winterbottom, Rebecca Conley, Whitney Gibson Medford and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Nasim MotayarDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Integrated Hospital Care Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.ORCID 0009-0005-7344-6964
Krzysztof LaudanskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Huijun XiaoDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Xiaofeng F WangDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Hesham A HassaballaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Rush Copley Medical Center, Aurora, IL.
Carrie L GriffithsDivision of Pharmacy, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Elizabeth A ScruthDepartment of Quality, Risk and Regulatory, Kaiser Permanente, Pleasanton, CA.
Fiona A WinterbottomDepartment of Virtual Critical Care, Ochsner Health, New Orleans, LA.
Rebecca ConleyDepartment of Pharmacy, Baycare Health System Virtual ICU, Clearwater, FL.
Whitney Gibson MedfordDepartment of Pharmacy, Baycare Health System Virtual ICU, Clearwater, FL.
Jayashree RaikhelkarDivision of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.
Ryan HakimiDepartment of Medicine Neurology, University of South Carolina School of Medicine-Greenville, Greenville, SC.
Sonia S EverhartDivision of Pharmacy, Atrium Health, Charlotte, NC.
Andre L HolderDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCurrent research does not address the existence and impact of structured tele-critical care (TCC) training on the delivery of care in the ICU. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the association between on boarding elements focused on training and clinicians perceptions of delivery of care.

designCross-sectional survey study. SETTING AND

participantsCritical Care professionals at four U.S. hospitals, professional meetings and Society of Critical Care Medicine's International Membership base. Participants were active clinicians who practice in the TCC setting.

interventionsNone. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsA total of 432 participants responded to the survey, 227 met the eligibility criteria (52.5%) and were included in the analysis. Respondents were a multi-professional group of TCC clinicians aged between 35-55 years of age (56.4%). Seventy-four percent of respondents reported having orientation before providing TCC, 46% reported having formal mentorship, and 66% reported formal training on their institutional platform. Provision of orientation before participating in a TCC program was associated with higher ratings of feeling prepared (odds ratio [OR], 3.52; p < 0.001) and feeling accepted as part of the ICU team (OR, 2.21; p = 0.008). Mentorship was associated with feeling more prepared (OR, 8.2; p < 0.001) and higher comfort in delivering care (OR, 2.78; p = 0.016). Platform training was associated with feeling more prepared (OR, 4.66; p < 0.001), comfortable in delivering care (OR, 3.6; p = 0.002), feeling accepted as part of the team (OR, 3.18; p < 0.001), and more likely to participate in quality improvement (OR, 2.51; p = 0.001). A site visit also made a positive impact in feeling prepared (OR, 2.86; p < 0.001), comfortable (OR, 4.95; p = 0.002), feeling like recommendations were accepted (OR, 3.73; p < 0.001), more likely to recommend TCC (OR, 3.18; p = 0.001), and participating in quality improvement (OR, 3.24; p < 0.001).

conclusionsIn this pilot study, structured training utilizing orientation, mentorship, and platform training as surrogates, along with a site visit before beginning delivery of care in a TCC setting, were associated with more positive perceptions in the delivery of care domains assessed. We highlight potentially important factors that warrant further evaluation and assessment of the need for standardization across TCC programs.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCritical CareDelivery of Health CareTelemedicineAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statesclinician’s perceptiondelivery of carestructured trainingtele-critical-care

Identifiers

PMID41460511
PMCPMC12753159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.