ArticlePediatric surgery international2025
Long-term follow-up of scar quality and satisfaction after surgical closure of congenital abdominal wall defects: a single center perspective.
Article in Pediatric surgery international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effect of early application of a skin surface closure device combined with pulsed dye laser on the morphologic characteristics and clinical symptoms of tension scars on the backs of children.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePostoperative scarring remains a major concern for patients and parents following repair of congenital abdominal wall defects. This study evaluated perceptions of postoperative scars in children after omphalocele or gastroschisis repair, comparing self-assessments with parental evaluations. We hypothesized that parents perceive scarring more negatively than their children.
methodsA single-center study was conducted among patients treated for omphalocele or gastroschisis at the Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Erlangen (2001-2011). Between July 2022 and March 2023, patients and their parents completed the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) 2.0, Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire (PSAQ), and Short Form-36 (SF-36). Exclusion criteria were death or psychomotor impairment precluding reliable self-assessment.
resultsTwenty-eight participants (61% gastroschisis, 39% omphalocele) were included. Parents rated scar appearance more negatively than their children (POSAS overall impression p = 0.040; appearance p = 0.002 in omphalocele). PSAQ revealed discrepancies regarding scar-related symptoms (p = 0.006) and satisfaction (p = 0.009 total; p = 0.038 omphalocele). Parents tended to underestimate children's physical complaints (p = 0.099). No differences were found between defect types. SF-36 indicated high overall quality of life (mean 79.9 ± 13.3).
conclusionSignificant parent-child differences exist in scar perception. Parents emphasize cosmetic concerns, whereas children report physical symptoms. Larger studies are warranted to guide tailored postoperative support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.