ReviewBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026
Bridging across the pacific: overview of the 33rd annual meeting of the Japanese breast cancer society.
Review in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Secondary breast surgery after initial partial mastectomy for breast cancer in Japan.Surgery today · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article summarizes key discussions from the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, which examined differences and shared challenges in breast cancer care between Asian and Western countries across the Pacific. Surgical methods and radiation practices varied by country, most likely due to body habitus and clinical settings. Cylinder-shaped resection and conventional boost irradiation remain common in Japan, while seed-guided partial mastectomy and short-course irradiation regimens are widely used in the United States (US). Despite these differences, it was reported that both regions achieved excellent local control, and the need for clearer standards in pathological margin evaluation was noted. For premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ovarian function suppression (OFS) was more frequently used in Asia, whereas poor adherence to endocrine therapy was identified as a major issue in the US. Genomic testing is expected to guide future treatment selection. The prepectoral direct-to-implant technique using acellular dermal matrices (ADM) has become routine in the US and South Korea, but its use remains limited in Japan and Taiwan because of insurance and regulatory restrictions. Dense breasts were discussed as a common issue. Risk-stratified screening and AI-assisted reading are expanding, although approaches differ across regions. Advance care planning (ACP) was noted to reflect cultural values-family-centered "relational autonomy" in Asia and individual decision-making in Western countries. The credibility of online health information and differences in health literacy were identified as important concerns. Initiatives to improve the accuracy and evaluation of patient information are now progressing. The meeting highlighted the importance of adapting clinical evidence to regional contexts and strengthening international collaboration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.