Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41460477›Full record

ReviewBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2026

Bridging across the pacific: overview of the 33rd annual meeting of the Japanese breast cancer society.

Hiroki Kusama, Yoshiya Horimoto, Kayo Adachi, Yoichi Koyama, Kyoko Orimoto, Takahiko Kawate, Fuyo Kimura, Takako Komiya, Hiroshi Kaise, Kimito Yamada and 4 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Hiroki KusamaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan. kusama.hiroki.8j@tokyo-med.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2163-7989
Yoshiya HorimotoDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8935-0768
Kayo AdachiDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1425-2271
Yoichi KoyamaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7435-1346
Kyoko OrimotoDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2194-1518
Takahiko KawateDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6074-7702
Fuyo KimuraDepartment of Breast Surgery, The Second Kawasaki Saiwai Clinic, Kanagawa, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5689-4494
Takako KomiyaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7018-793X
Hiroshi KaiseDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-783X
Kimito YamadaDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5443-7078
Tatsunori ShimoiDepartment of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3603-8575
Goro KutomiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Juntendo University Juntendo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4557-5126
Kazuaki TakabeDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6435-4241
Takashi IshikawaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3450-4533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article summarizes key discussions from the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, which examined differences and shared challenges in breast cancer care between Asian and Western countries across the Pacific. Surgical methods and radiation practices varied by country, most likely due to body habitus and clinical settings. Cylinder-shaped resection and conventional boost irradiation remain common in Japan, while seed-guided partial mastectomy and short-course irradiation regimens are widely used in the United States (US). Despite these differences, it was reported that both regions achieved excellent local control, and the need for clearer standards in pathological margin evaluation was noted. For premenopausal hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ovarian function suppression (OFS) was more frequently used in Asia, whereas poor adherence to endocrine therapy was identified as a major issue in the US. Genomic testing is expected to guide future treatment selection. The prepectoral direct-to-implant technique using acellular dermal matrices (ADM) has become routine in the US and South Korea, but its use remains limited in Japan and Taiwan because of insurance and regulatory restrictions. Dense breasts were discussed as a common issue. Risk-stratified screening and AI-assisted reading are expanding, although approaches differ across regions. Advance care planning (ACP) was noted to reflect cultural values-family-centered "relational autonomy" in Asia and individual decision-making in Western countries. The credibility of online health information and differences in health literacy were identified as important concerns. Initiatives to improve the accuracy and evaluation of patient information are now progressing. The meeting highlighted the importance of adapting clinical evidence to regional contexts and strengthening international collaboration.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansJapanSocieties, Medical33rd annual meetingBreast cancer

Identifiers

PMID41460477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.