ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Using Collective Impact for intersectoral action in rural Northern Ontario: Two case studies.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
settingTimiskaming District in Northern Ontario has a population of 32,394 people across 24 municipalities, two unincorporated areas, and four First Nations. During the time of these case studies, public health services were provided by the Timiskaming Health Unit, one of 34 local public health agencies in Ontario.
interventionTo address local public health priorities in this rural region, the Timiskaming Health Unit implemented the Collective Impact framework, establishing governance structures for two initiatives: the Timiskaming Community Safety and Wellbeing Plan (CSWB) and Timiskaming Drug and Alcohol Strategy (TDAS). Acting as the backbone organization, the Health Unit facilitated a common agenda, shared progress measures, and coordinated mutually reinforcing activities. OUTCOMES: The 2023 CSWB Plan, co-funded by all 24 municipalities, established a steering committee and three working groups to address safety and well-being goals. TDAS, launched in 2022, engages over 20 organizations and community members through a steering committee and four working groups. Deliverables include public events, navigational resources, social marketing campaigns, capacity building, new health infrastructure, improved collaboration, and advocacy for healthy public policy. IMPLICATIONS: These initiatives demonstrate how local public health units can use the Collective Impact framework to address complex rural public health challenges. By integrating a continuous learning approach, implementation can integrate knowledge to foster collaboration that leads to community engagement and policy change. However, sustainable funding is critical for supporting collaborative governance and mitigating challenges like limited rural data availability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.