ArticleAnnals of nuclear medicine2026
Transient bradycardia during
Article in Annals of nuclear medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLutetium (¹⁷⁷Lu) oxodotreotide (¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE, Lutathera®) is widely used for neuroendocrine tumors. Although cardiovascular adverse events are not well recognized, we frequently observe bradycardia during infusion under monitoring. We aimed to characterize heart-rate changes during ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE administration and explore risk factors for bradycardia.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 130 administrations in 37 patients (April 2022–April 2025). Heart rate was recorded at four time points: (i) upon entering the room, (ii) the start of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE administration (during L-lysine/L-arginine amino acid infusion), (iii) dose-rate adjustment at 10 min, and (iv) the end of infusion at 30 min. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to evaluate changes in vital signs. Demographics, comorbidities, and laboratory values (electrolytes, hemoglobin, albumin, total protein) were collected. Cardiomegaly on imaging was determined visually using recent CT or MRI. Multivariable analyses were performed to examine predictors of heart rate change. Patient characteristics were also compared between those with and without bradycardia (≤ 50 bpm) using the chi-squared test.
resultsMean heart rate decreased over time: upon entering the room (72.3 bpm), at the start of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE administration (64.5 bpm), and during dose rate adjustment (59.5 bpm). (all p < 0.001). Furthermore, at the end of infusion (66.2 bpm), it returned to a level similar to that at the start of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE administration; patterns were similar across treatment cycles. Mean blood pressure decreased upon initiation of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE (119.3/73.6 mmHg) compared to upon entering the room (127.8/78.3 mmHg), with no differences observed at other time points. Twenty-two administrations reached ≤ 50 bpm; chest discomfort occurred in five instances and resolved with observation. Multivariable models showed no significant predictors for the magnitude of heart-rate change. However, cardiac enlargement was associated with bradycardia during rate adjustment (p = 0.045). No significant associations were seen with age, sex, history of arrhythmia, or laboratory parameters.
conclusionsTransient heart-rate decline, occasionally meeting bradycardia, commonly occurs during ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE infusion but typically resolves by completion and rarely requires intervention. Recognizing its benign, self-limiting nature—and the higher susceptibility among patients with preexisting cardiac enlargement—may reduce unnecessary treatment interruptions and improve procedural safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.