ArticleAnimal cognition2025
Effectiveness of shading and linear perspective cues in eliciting three-dimensional perception of bidimensional images in dogs.
Article in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Three-dimensionality perception relies on the integration of various depth cues, with monocular pictorial cues playing a key role in two-dimensional representations. Previous research indicates that dogs are sensitive to a combination of shading and linear perspective when perceiving three-dimensionality, yet the individual contributions of these cues remain unclear. The aim of the present study was to disentangle the specific contribution of shading and linear perspective in promoting three-dimensional perception in dogs. In a series of four experiments involving 120 dogs, subjects were presented with a ball rolling on an apparatus and either falling inside a real hole (control condition) or keeping rolling over a depicted hole (test condition). Experiments 1 and 2 assessed the individual contribution of linear perspective and shading in dogs’ perception of three-dimensionality; Experiment 3, as a replica of previous findings, investigated the combination of both cues; Experiment 4 explored the role of more intense shading. In a violation of expectation paradigm, dogs showed no sensitivity to the pictorial cue of linear perspective or low shading level alone. Conversely, the combination of linear perspective and shading, as well as intense shading alone, successfully elicited three-dimensional perception. These results confirm that dogs can successfully integrate multiple pictorial cues to perceive three-dimensionality from two-dimensional stimuli. The perception of three-dimensionality can also occur through single cues, but only if the cue is sufficiently intense, at least in the case of shading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.