ArticleClinical oral investigations2025
Exploring hypoxia- and cuproptosis-related biomarkers in periodontitis based on transcriptome and single-cell analysis.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPeriodontitis (PD) is a chronic, multifactorial inflammatory disorder characterized by the progressive destruction of periodontal tissues. Increasing evidence indicates that the dysregulation of hypoxia-related genes (HRGs) plays a pivotal role in inflammatory diseases, including PD. Recent studies have also implicated cuproptosis-a novel copper-dependent form of programmed cell death-in PD pathogenesis, suggesting a potential link with cuproptosis-related genes (CRGs). Despite these findings, the interaction between hypoxia, cuproptosis, and PD progression remains poorly understood. This study aims to identify and characterize key biomarkers associated with hypoxia and cuproptosis in PD, offering novel insights into its molecular mechanisms.
methodsPD datasets were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. PD biomarkers were obtained through differential analysis, gene set variation analysis (GSVA), machine learning, diagnostic evaluation, and expression level validation.A predictive nomogram incorporating these biomarkers was constructed to evaluate their clinical utility. Additionally, functional enrichment analysis, immune cell infiltration profiling, and drug prediction were conducted to explore the biological roles and therapeutic implications of the biomarkers. Single-cell RNA sequencing data from GSE152042 were also analyzed to assess cell-type composition and examine biomarker expression at the single-cell level.
resultsDifferential analysis identified seven genes. The Boruta algorithm selected six feature genes (ALOX15B, FAM46C, IGHD, SAA1, SLC16A9, SPAG17), with SPAG17 showing the highest importance score. LASSO regression identified five genes (IGHD, FAM46C, SPAG17, SAA1, SLC16A9), while RFE pinpointed four genes (SPAG17, SLC16A9, SAA1, IGHD). In GSE16134 and GSE10334, SPAG17 and SLC16A9 exhibited significantly lower expression in PD compared to controls (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05), whereas SAA1 and IGHD were significantly elevated. All four genes demonstrated AUC > 0.8. Unsupervised clustering identified eight cell types. SLC16A9 had the highest expression prevalence (82.1%) and mean expression (1.85 TPM) in epithelial cells; SPAG17 was predominantly expressed in perivascular cells (65.3%, 1.42 TPM), SAA1 in fibroblasts (73.6%, 2.01 TPM), and IGHD in B cells (89.2%, 2.37 TPM).
conclusionIGHD, SAA1, SLC16A9, and SPAG17 were identified as key biomarkers of PD. Pathway analysis and drug prediction provided insights into potential therapeutic targets, advancing the understanding of PD diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460373What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.