ArticleJournal of computer-aided molecular design2025
Needle-in-a-haystack approach: rapid screening of PDE1C inhibitors through the combination of machine learning, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulations and experimental validation.
Article in Journal of computer-aided molecular design, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Phosphodiesterases (PDEs), particularly PDE1C, regulate cyclic nucleotide signaling and are promising therapeutic targets for diseases such as cardiovascular disorders, pulmonary hypertension, neurocognitive conditions, and certain cancers. However, the development of selective PDE1C inhibitors is hindered by the structural diversity and functional redundancy within the PDE family, with only one inhibitor, ITI-214, reaching clinical trials. Traditional experimental screening methods are resource-intensive and often yield suboptimal results, necessitating more efficient approaches. In this study, we employed an integrated computational strategy combining machine learning (ML), molecular docking, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to rapidly screen for novel PDE1C inhibitors. An ML model was developed to predict PDE1C inhibitory activity, validated with an out-of-sample dataset, and applied to compounds pre-selected via molecular docking (docking score ≤ -10.00 kcal/mol) to estimate pIC50 values. Six representative compounds were subjected to 100 ns MD simulations to assess binding stability with the PDE1C protein. Top-ranked compounds underwent in vitro validation, confirming two candidates with high PDE1C inhibitory potency. This multi-tiered approach enhances screening efficiency, mitigates individual method limitations, and provides a robust framework for identifying PDE1C inhibitors, paving the way for further lead optimization and preclinical development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460364What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.