ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026
Long-interval neurons are selective for slower pulse rates in chorus frogs that are sympatric versus allopatric with congeneric heterospecifics.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Different populations of a species may overlap geographically with closely related taxa, increasing the risk of maladaptive hybridization. In such contact zones, male advertisement calls and corresponding female preferences can diverge between sympatric and allopatric populations, contributing to reproductive isolation. The neural basis of these population-level differences in communication, however, remains poorly understood. In the Upland chorus frog (Pseudacris feriarum), sympatric populations produce advertisement calls with faster pulse rates and/or more pulses per call than allopatric populations. To examine potential neural correlates of this divergence, we recorded from long-interval neurons (LINs) in the auditory midbrain using in vivo extracellular methods and compared their temporal selectivity across populations. LINs from allopatric populations responded to a wider range of pulse rates, extending to faster rates than LINs from sympatric populations, which responded primarily to slower pulse rates characteristic of heterospecific calls. These findings demonstrate population-level differences in LIN temporal tuning and reveal a mismatch between pulse rate selectivity and the temporal properties of sympatric advertisement calls. Our results reveal that LINs are a target of reinforcing selection, and provide initial evidence toward understanding how auditory processing differs across populations experiencing different selective pressures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460336What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.