Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41460335›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2026

The lepidopteran analyst: how caterpillars, moths and butterflies encode taste identity and valence.

Dimitri Peftuloglu, Joop J A van Loon, Alexander Haverkamp

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dimitri PeftulogluLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Joop J A van LoonLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Alexander HaverkampLaboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University & Research, 6708PB, Wageningen, The Netherlands. alexander.haverkamp@wur.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sense of taste is crucial for butterflies and moths to accomplish important life tasks such as feeding or selecting suitable oviposition sites. In Lepidoptera taste is of special importance since they are constantly confronted with a vast amount of plant secondary metabolites combined with sugars, amino acids and other primary metabolites that they need to fuel their metabolism. The high importance of many tastants for feeding and oviposition gives these compounds a strong innate meaning for the animal. During associative learning this positive or negative valence often functions as reward or punishment, giving the sense of taste an important role during memory formation. In this review we first address some general mechanisms of gustatory detection before focusing on the taste system of caterpillars and adult Lepidoptera specifically. We list recent examples of receptor genes for which the main ligands have been identified, but place special emphasis on the neuronal and behavioral responses to different tastants. Thereafter the detection of primary and secondary metabolites is reviewed, with a focus on the role of secondary plant metabolites during host-plant choice. Finally, we compiled different results on the taste processing in the lepidopteran brain and highlight the role of taste during associative learning. In this review we combined information on the role of taste for both innate and learned responses of Lepidoptera to their environment, aiming to provide a starting point for further explorations into this essential sensory modality.

Indexed as

ButterfliesLepidopteraMothsTasteTaste PerceptionAnimalsLarvaAssociative learningInsect gustationPlant metabolitesSensory evolutionTaste coding

Identifiers

PMID41460335
PMCPMC13086748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.