ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2026
Comparative Analysis of Dorsal and Ventral Onlay Urethroplasty with Buccal Mucosal Graft in Female Urethral Strictures: A Multi-Center Study.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Comparative Analysis of Dorsal and Ventral Onlay Urethroplasty with Buccal Mucosal Graft in Female Urethral Strictures: A Multi-Center Study".International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Author Commentary on "Comparative Analysis of Dorsal and Ventral Onlay Urethroplasty with Buccal Mucosal Graft in Female Urethral Strictures: A Multi-Center Study".International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to compare the outcomes of dorsal and ventral onlay urethroplasties using buccal mucosal grafts for the treatment of urethral strictures in women, focusing on patency, complications, de novo incontinence, and impact on sexual function.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients who underwent dorsal (n = 38) and ventral (n = 27) onlay female urethroplasty using a buccal mucosal graft between July 2017 and January 2024 across three centers. Patency was determined by the successful passage of a 16-French cystoscope or by a maximum flow rate exceeding 15 ml/s.
resultsMedian age, etiology, and stenosis characteristics of the two groups were comparable. At the final follow-up, the patency rates for dorsal and ventral onlay female urethroplasty were 92.1% and 92.6% respectively (p = 1.0). There was no significant difference in postoperative maximum flow rates, postvoid residual urine, Female Sexual Function Index scores, Patient Global Impressions of Change scores, and de novo incontinence rates between the groups. The median blood loss was significantly lower in the ventral onlay group than in the dorsal onlay group (10 vs 20 ml, p = 0.001).
conclusionsDorsal and ventral onlay urethroplasties with buccal mucosal graft are safe and effective techniques for managing female urethral stricture, with similar patency, complications, de novo incontinence rates, and improvements in sexual function. Ventral onlay female urethroplasty has been associated with reduced intraoperative bleeding. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the largest individual comparative cohort in the literature that directly evaluates dorsal and ventral onlay female urethroplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460329What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.