ArticlePsychological research2025
The emotional responses to the sounds of organic affective tactile gestures.
Article in Psychological research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Affective touch offers numerous benefits for touchers and touchees, including emotional regulation. However, individuals are engaging in affective touch increasingly less, in part due to the digitalization of experiences, which motivates the question of whether the emotional benefits of affective touch can be conveyed in alternative ways, such as through different sensory modalities. With this in mind, we investigated the emotional responses to the auditory signals produced by organic affective touch gestures. In particular, participants in our five online experiments evaluated different sounds resulting from touch gestures performed by real romantically involved dyads. Experiment 1 provided an overview of the organic affective touch space. Experiment 2 revealed that, lacking explicit cues about the nature of the sounds, organic affective touch sounds elicited emotional responses with reduced positivity, similar to those evoked by object-based interaction sounds. Moreover, we found that individuals were unable to confidently identify whether the sounds involved affective touch gestures. Experiment 3 revealed that framing organic affective touch sounds explicitly as real affective touch, rather than as object-based tactile interactions, elicited more positive emotional responses. Experiment 4 revealed that greater congruence between individuals' expectations of the sounds of affective touch and the actual auditory cues positively influenced the valence elicited by the sounds. Experiment 5 replicated the effects of framing on the valence of elicited responses with a more salient experimental manipulation. These findings contribute to our understanding of affective touch and underscore the importance of meaning in the construction of its emotional space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460327What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.