ArticleTropical animal health and production2025
Growth performance and nutrient digestibility of yearling Pedi goat bucks fed prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruit as a replacement for Cenchrus ciliaris hay.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effect of replacing Cenchrus ciliaris hay with prickly pear (Opuntia ficus-indica) fruit meal (PPFM) in diets on growth performance and nutrient digestibility of yearling male Pedi goats. Twenty-four yearly Pedi goat bucks were randomly assigned to 4 treatments in a completely randomized design, replicated six times with one goat per replicate. Prickly pear inclusion levels were 0, 10, 20, or 30%. Prickly pear fruit meal inclusion level affected (p < 0.05) DM, OM, Ash, CP, ADF, NDF, and EE intakes. Prickly pear inclusion level in the diet had no effect (p > 0.05) on feed conversion ratios and water intake of goats. However, the prickly pear level in the diet affected (p < 0.05) final live weight, average daily gain (ADG), and feed intake of goat bucks. Nutrient intake and digestibility of bucks in the present study were optimized at different inclusion levels of prickly pear meals. The results indicate that moderate inclusion levels (10–20%) optimally enhance nutrient intake and digestibility, whereas higher inclusion (30%) may reduce intake due to bulkiness and lower nutrient density. It was concluded that indigenous Pedi goat bucks have optimal productivity responses to prickly pear meal inclusion was variable, depending on the production variable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41460293What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.