Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41460159›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2026

Evaluation of cattle sub-species and growth-promoting technology on growth performance, carcass characteristics, and enteric gas flux of steers finished in winter feedlot conditions.

Ashley K Schilling-Hazlett, Kimberly R Stackhouse-Lawson, Tony C Bryant, Sara E Place, John P Ritten, Juan J Vargas, Irene A Reis, Edilane C Martins, Maya A Swenson, Erin N Burke and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Ashley K Schilling-HazlettCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Kimberly R Stackhouse-LawsonCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.ORCID 0000-0001-7435-8695
Tony C BryantFive Rivers Cattle Feeding, Johnstown, CO 80534.
Sara E PlaceCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
John P RittenCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Juan J VargasCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-3850
Irene A ReisCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Edilane C MartinsCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Maya A SwensonCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Erin N BurkeCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Rhyse K CampionCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Cesar VelasquezCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Anna M ShadboltCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Pedro H V CarvalhoCSU AgNext, Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523.ORCID 0000-0003-1620-6831

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study objectives were to evaluate the comparative growth performance, carcass characteristics, and gas flux of yearling Bos taurus indicus (BI; Brahman) and Bos taurus taurus (BT; Angus) steers managed with (GPT+) and without (GPT-) the use of growth-promoting technology (GPT) in winter conditions. One hundred BI (initial body weight [IBW] = 364 ± 22 kg) and 100 BT (IBW = 323 ± 17 kg) steers were fed for 180 d in two consecutive phases. In Phase 1, day 0-83, steers of each sub-species were blocked by IBW and randomly assigned to a treatment (10 hd/pen, 5 pens/treatment). In Phase 2, day 84-180, steers were moved to Climate Smart Research Pens, where each treatment was randomly assigned to a research pen equipped to measure individual feed intake and gas flux (50 hd/pen, 1 pen/treatment). Data were analyzed with R (R Core Team, 2021, v. 4.4.1) software to assess the fixed effects of cattle sub-species, treatment, and the sub-species × treatment interaction. In Phase 1, IBW differed (P < 0.01) by sub-species, but did not differ (P = 0.98) by treatment. Dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and feed efficiency (G:F) were greater (P < 0.01) for BT, resulting in greater final body weight (FBW) for Phase 1. Within sub-species, DMI, on a total daily basis and as a percentage of body weight, did not differ (P ≥ 0.09) between treatments in Phase 1, but ADG, G:F, and FBW were greater (P ≤ 0.04) for GPT+ than GPT-. In Phase 2, G:F and DMI when represented on a total daily and as a percentage of BW basis had a sub-species × treatment interaction (P ≤ 0.04) where greater increases in G:F and DMI were observed between GPT+ and GPT- for BI than for BT. Steers managed with GPT and BT steers had greater (P ≤ 0.01) ADG and FBW. Calculated yield grade and backfat thickness were greater (P < 0.01) for BT steers, and BT had more (P < 0.01) USDA Choice and Prime quality grades than BI. Longissimus muscle area was greater (P < 0.01) for BT and GPT+ steers. Daily methane (CH4) emitted was less for BI steers; however, CH4 as a proportion of DMI and gross energy intake were less (P < 0.01) for BT steers. There was a sub-species × treatment interaction (P < 0.01) for CH4 per unit ADG, where a decrease was observed between GPT- and GPT+ for BI, while no difference was observed for BT. In conclusion, BT had greater growth performance and carcass quality, but observations differed by cattle sub-species when CH4 was reported on an absolute versus yield or intensity basis.

Indexed as

CattleGasesAnimal FeedAnimalsBody WeightClimate ChangeMaleOxygenSeasonsGasesOxygenBos taurus indicusBos taurus taurusgrowth performancegrowth-promoting technologymethane gas fluxsustainability

Identifiers

PMID41460159
PMCPMC12878330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.