ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Clinicopathological insights into ophthalmic Rosai-Dorfman disease: A 15-year retrospective analysis.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the clinicopathological characteristics of ophthalmic Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD).
methodsA 15-year single-center retrospective case series on ophthalmic RDD.
resultsThirteen cases of ophthalmic RDD were identified, including eight males and five females, with a mean age of 49.2 years. The most common presenting signs were eye redness (76.9%) and proptosis (61.5%). The orbit was the most frequently involved site (84.6%). Epibulbar masses occurred in 53.8% of cases, and one case had a concurrent uveal lesion. Eyelid involvement was noted in 46.2% (six cases). Compressive optic neuropathy was documented in 23.1% (three patients). Bone erosion was observed in 53.8% (seven patients). Systemic involvement was present in 69.2% (9 patients), and lymphadenopathy was detected in 15.4% (two patients). Paranasal sinus infiltration occurred in 38.5% (five patients). Other systemic associations included skin and retroperitoneum/kidney (both 15.4%), cerebrum (7.7%), and cardiovascular system (7.7%). Histopathology revealed large S-100-positive histiocytes with emperipolesis in an inflammatory and fibrotic background in all cases. All were BRAF V600E negative, except one with a coexisting Erdheim-Chester-like lesion, suggesting mixed histiocytosis due to overlapping phenotypes with Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD). Increased IgG4-positive plasma cells were seen in 38.5% (five cases).
conclusionsOphthalmic RDD most frequently presents with orbital and epibulbar masses and rarely involves the uvea. Increased IgG4-positive plasma cells in some RDD cases necessitate careful differentiation from IgG4-related disease. In rare conditions, overlapping clinicopathological phenotypes with ECD and BRAF V600E mutation suggest a diagnosis of mixed RDD/ECD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.