Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41460137›Full record

Observational studyIndian journal of ophthalmology2026

Microbiological profile and antibiotic resistance trends of preoperative conjunctival swabs: An 8-year retrospective analysis from a North Indian tertiary care ophthalmic center.

Lavanya Gandepalli, Yennapu P Chandrika, Gita Satpathy, Prachala Rathod, Jeewan S Titiyal, Sudarshan Khokhar, Mandeep S Bajaj, Radhika Tandon, Rajpal Singh Vohra, Namrata Sharma and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Lavanya GandepalliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Yennapu P ChandrikaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Gita SatpathyDepartment of Ocular Microbiology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Prachala RathodDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Nagpur, Maharashtra, India.
Jeewan S TitiyalDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Sudarshan KhokharDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Mandeep S BajajDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Radhika TandonDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Rajpal Singh VohraDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Namrata SharmaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Nishat H AhmedDepartment of Ocular Microbiology, Dr. R.P. Center for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo assess the spectrum of bacterial flora from preoperative conjunctival swabs and analyze their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns.

designThis is a retrospective observational clinical study.

methodsThis retrospective, observational study analyzed conjunctival swab cultures collected 24-48 hours prior to elective ophthalmic surgeries at a tertiary eye care center in North India from January 2015 to December 2022. Aerobic bacterial cultures were performed using standard microbiological techniques. Isolates were identified and tested for antibiotic susceptibility using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method following CLSI guidelines. Data were stratified by patient age groups and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square testing.

resultsOf the 8671 conjunctival swabs analyzed, 1287 (14.8%) showed significant bacterial growth. The most prevalent isolates were Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS, 53.3%), Corynebacterium species (32.9%), and Staphylococcus aureus (10.7%). Methicillin resistance was observed in 40% of Staphylococcal isolates, with significant coresistance to fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and tetracyclines. No Vancomycin resistance was observed. Gram-negative bacteria, though infrequent (1.7%), were predominantly isolated from adult and elderly patients. Resistance trends showed a rising pattern over the 8-year period, particularly against fluoroquinolones and cefoxitin. Agewise, bacterial positivity was similar across pediatric (12.0%), adult (15.1%), and elderly (15.1%) groups (P = 0.1462).

conclusionThis large-scale study highlights the predominance of CoNS and Corynebacterium in the conjunctival flora and the rising resistance among Staphylococcal isolates, particularly to fluoroquinolones. These findings underscore the importance of region-specific surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship in guiding perioperative prophylaxis in ophthalmology. Vancomycin and aminoglycosides remain effective options, while empirical use of fluoroquinolones warrants cautious re-evaluation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaConjunctivaDrug Resistance, BacterialEye Infections, BacterialTertiary Care CentersAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIndiaInfantAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial susceptibilitybacterial cultureconjunctival swabpreoperative screening

Identifiers

PMID41460137
PMCPMC12867280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.