ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Assessing eye care behavior in rural India's traumatic cataract cases.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Eye injury rates and community cost savings through vision centers: Evidence from southern India.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOcular trauma is a major cause of monocular blindness. Early and timely reporting is essential for favorable visual outcomes. This study examines health-seeking behaviors in ocular trauma cases, with a focus on traumatic cataracts.
settingSingle-center study in Western Central India.
methodsThis retrospective study included all first-time traumatic cataract surgeries (previously operated cases excluded) performed between 2009 and 2022. Data from electronic medical records, including demographic and clinical details, were entered into pre-tested online forms, exported to Excel, and analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 22. Descriptive statistics and cross-tabulation were applied, with P < 0.05 considered significant. OUTCOME MEASURES: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA). STUDY POPULATION: A total of 2,093 eyes of 2,093 patients.
resultsOf the cohort, 1,473 (70.3%) were male and 620 (29.6%) female, median age 25 years; 39.4% were pediatric cases. The median interval between trauma and first consultation was 15 days; only 17.2% presented within 24 hours. Reporting interval significantly affected visual outcomes (P = 0.000). Most patients (91%) were from rural areas, and 86.3% were from low socioeconomic backgrounds. Pre- and post-surgical vision showed significant improvement, though delayed reporting reduced the gains. Main reasons for late presentation were lack of awareness, underestimation of severity, ignorance of primary care availability, and financial barriers.
conclusionDelayed reporting after ocular trauma leads to poorer visual outcomes. Community counseling and awareness programs for patients, caregivers, and healthcare workers are essential. Promoting early reporting can substantially reduce preventable blindness due to ocular trauma. Data Access Statement: Research data supporting this publication are available from the NN repository located at www.NNN.org/download.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.